My Twitter Rules of Engagement
I've been thinking about my Twitterholicism and the new 'friends' I've made and the old friends I've found because of my "social networking" (the new buzzword if you haven't noticed)...
How quickly I've gotten into Twitter like almost the rest of the world.
So here are some thoughts off the top of my head on why I Twit, with whom I Twit and what I won't Twit:
I've always found the status message on Yahoo Messenger a good indicator of states of minds - mine or others'. Sometimes they invite interaction; sometimes they don't. But they're there. A beacon telling friends what I'm up to or what I'm planning or reading or surfing. It's been a great way to share without actually sharing. Like talking to everyone and no one; like speaking out loud without actually having to carry on a conversation. Twitter lets me share this randomness without having to be heard.
I officially started 'serious' blogging this February. I joined VOX because Multiply was getting saturated by a different audience and for a different purpose; I joined WordPress because I wanted a 'real' blog; and I joined Blogger because I wanted to have a venue for me and my daughter to co-author a blog.
With all this blogging, I needed another blogging platform that wasn't a full on blogging platform; one which I was sure I would frequently update without having to think. My answer came in the form of Twitter. Now I can micro-blog. My friend, Paul, actually put it much better when he described it as "a constant stream of consciousness that captures snapshots of existence". How profound. I do it because I just like talking without talking.
So with all this twitting going on, I have learned the finer art of whom to follow and when, and whom not to follow and when. As a courtesy, I find myself adding people back who have added me as a friend. I guess it's just the way I'm wired. I like reciprocating, and to show my appreciation, I make it a point to add back when added.
It may sound lame, but my thinking is that if someone took the trouble of adding me, what harm could there be in an answered add? Of course the first thing I do is visit their websites and then poke around other sites they've linked to to find possible points of common ground. Sometimes I'll simply add someone because they are witty, or intelligent, or are living a life I wish were mine.
But what I've discovered with all this adding and growing list of Friends, is that these Friends have Friends who are not my friends so I'm finding myself getting annoyed when I am having to 'listen' in on long conversations that don't include me. I think that's what the Direct Message feature is for... which I use a lot. I don't mind an occasional conversation with an @ here and there, but non-stop @'s that are not meant for me, or have any benefit to me, get on my nerves.
So I've learned how to leave certain people from time to time. No offense meant.
I sometimes go on twitter frenzies but more often than not, I try to limit my posts to one a day when nothing's going on. Or I'll share something that just might strike a chord with someone else. It's great when you find that connection from a twit. I find myself going - "I know how that feels!" And either twit back or simply, smile. I twit about the most random of things, but I draw the line at anything that might potentially offend people. Like bodily functions and other things meant to be kept at home.. or in the bedroom or bathroom. That, and anything that would be a breach of confidentiality.
Happy twittering! Til the next thing comes along! Cheers!
Hmmm... I heard Jaiku is interesting... and growing...
Comments
Sometimes me and my buds hang out together chatting. Often there are 3 or more of us in the group. In the course of a conversation, two members of the group will be exchanging comments and the third be listening patiently. Though the conversation may be between the other two, the third person is still part of the conversation and welcome to join in.
You see this allot at public speaking events (conferences, classes, seminars, etc.). The speaker will be addressing an individual in the room but the exchange is meant for the entire room.
I see @ tweets as being very similar. When I @ tweet someone I am addressing them but I am saying it publicly with the express implied invitation for anyone listening to chime in. Like saying something to someone out loud vs writing them a letter.
Just another perspective. :)
On a different note, Jaiku is very sexy looking and has some nice features but IMO it lacks some of the more functional aspects Twitter has mastered. Plus it had some annoying bugs last time I tried it like no time zone localization.
It never hurts to look though, right?
- Bidi
oh, and re: adding those who have added you: i feel the same way. it's just a matter of courtesy diba. =]
so i guess this means you're now a vox-er...? =)
thanks for stopping by and commenting! and yes, i understand your perspective. and i don't hate it as much as it sounds but when i'm stuck 'listening' to one @ after another @ from one person sending at least ten @'s, i'm thinkin... conference chat would be better...
hope to see you around VOX, bidi!
jaiku! i took a peek but haven't signed up just yet... one of my vox friends who joined twitter up and left and is now happier on jaiku... jonbeckett73. stop by <a href="http://jonathanbeckett.vox.com/library/post/goodbye-twitter-hello-jaiku.html" target="_blank">Jonathan's Vox</a> to see his post.
and let me know if i should sign up...! =)
Here is my list of why I'm not using Jaiku for my primary micro blogging site.
First is the time zone issue. I've posted jaiku's in the late evening only to have them show up for the next day when it wasn't even midnight yet. Sometimes it doesn't make sense when you say it's getting late and it shows up as the first post for the next day. It's a small but not insignificant thing.
Second issue is mobility. Twitter has a local SMS id for the US. Jaiku is only accessable through SMS with an international address. With sprint this is an additional fee per message.
Twitter also has a fully flushed out API and IM access for sending tweets. Jaiku is starting to build their API but it is still early on in it's development and the only alternate method of sending updates is their web interface.
Jaiku is working on a java based phone client but last I checked the only phone client they had was for Nokia phones only.
Twitter is usable through a mobile web browser for me. I'm on a Razor phone with Sprint for a carrier. Jaiku is unpredictable at best. With lots of fussing I can get logged in and check messages but sending through the web interface won't work for me on my phone.
My last reason is popularity. To be simply honest what these services need is a sharing protocol of some sort similar to Jabber for IM. Everyone I know or want to have in my social network is on Twitter. I think most of them for at least one of the above mentioned reasons.
Twitter has had more than a few bugs as of late but on the whole it is still delivering the service I expect.
My advice: Sign up for Jaiku. Set up aggregations feeds for your blog and twitter accounts as well as any other services you use. Do a couple posts to try it out. Then go back to Twitter and use Jaiku as more of an internet activity log. IMO it's not quite ready to compete with Twitter yet.
Hope this helps. :)
PS: Regarding the excessive use of @ tweets, I agree. Too many @ tweets and you might as well get a room. ;)
thanks for the explanation! =)